Mild Cognitive Impairment
Studies of cognitive changes across the life span must distinguish between normal gradual change in the elderly and change that is associated with disordered functioning. Studies must also respect the complexity of the human brain. Morton Hunt notes that cognitive scientists have concluded that there may be 100 billion neurons in the interior of the brain. Each of these neurons may be interconnected to hundreds of others by anywhere from one thousand to ten thousand synapses, or relay points. This may enable the average healthy person to accumulate five hundred times as much information as is contained in the entire Encyclopedia Britannica, or 100 trillion bits of information. The circuitry in one human brain is probably sixty times the complexity of the entire United States telephone system. Given this complexity, even the daily estimated loss of 100,000 brain cells from the aging process may leave human beings capable of sound cognitive functioning well into old age. “Mild cognitive impairment” is a term used to describe isolated memory losses without changes in activities of daily living. There is some support for the theory that mild cognitive impairment represents a transitional stage between normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease and may be a precursor to Alzheimer’s disease. A significant proportion of patients with mild cognitive impairment do not progress to Alzheimer’s disease. One research study followed a group of mildly cognitively impaired patients and reported they developed Alzheimer’s disease at a rate of 10 percent to 15 percent per year, while individuals without mild cognitive impairment developed Alzheimer’s disease at a rate of 1 percent to 2 percent per year. Individuals who have a memory problem but do not meet clinical criteria for Alzheimer’s disease are considered to have mild cognitive impairment with memory loss. This is an important group for Alzheimer’s disease research because up to 40 percent of those who are mildly cognitively impaired develop Alzheimer’s disease within three years. One study supported that those who carried the gene apolipoprotein E-4 (APOE-4) were more likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease. Studies involving molecular brain activity have contributed to understanding normal and abnormal memory activities. Another study linked poor performance on a memory test that provided cues to help participants at time of recall indicated a cognitive decline. To date, there are no treatments to prevent or manage mild cognitive impairment. Therefore, awareness, understanding the implications, and early identification are important in management and education about mild cognitive impairment. Paul Baltes notes that it used to be considered “common knowledge” that cognitive abilities decline with age, but today this view is highly debatable. When the effects of disease and injury are separated out in studies of the healthy elderly, no drastic decline in cognitive ability is found. This conclusion may be one reason that studies of cognition and aging have begun to make a distinction regarding intelligence. The distinction is between crystallized intelligence, involving the accumulation of facts and knowledge, which holds up with age, and fluid intelligence, which is the rapid processing of new information, a function that appears particularly associated with the young and vulnerable to the effects of age or disease. Studies of neurologically healthy aging adults have revealed no consistent evidence of a reduced ability to learn. Studies have further shown that very little practice may be required to improve substantially an elderly person’s ability to perform some cognitive tasks, reflecting a motivational factor. Studies of mentally active persons in their eighties have concluded that loss of cognitive ability stemmed more from intellectual apathy or boredom than from actual physical deterioration. John Darley and his colleagues concluded that on average, the decline of intellectual capability with age is slight and probably does not occur before age seventy-five. When declines do occur, they do not occur equally across cognitive functions. Vocabulary and verbal skills may actually improve with age, whereas skills involving spatial visualization and deductive reasoning are more likely to diminish. In general, verbal skills and accumulated knowledge are maintained with aging, while tasks that require quick responses are more susceptible to aging.
154 times read
|
Related news
|
| No matching news for this article |
|
Did you enjoy this article?
    (total 14 votes)
|