Header
Home | Set as homepage | Add to favorites
  Search the Site     » Advanced Search
Sections
Syndication
Newsletter



Language and the Symbolic

Sep 07,2010 by xaero

image

This is the point at which the child enters the register of the symbolic. It is at

this stage, according to Lacan, that the child also enters the “language system.”

Absence, lack, and separation characterize the language system, according

to Lacan, because language names things which are not immediately

present (“signifieds”) and substitutes words (“signifiers”) for them.

This is also the beginning of socialization, says Lacan. Just as the child realizes

that sexual identity is the result of an originary difference between

mother and father, it comes to grasp that language itself is an unending

chain of “differences,” and that the terms of language are what they are only

by excluding one another. Signs always presuppose the absence of the objects

they signify—an insight which Lacan inherited from structuralist anthropology

and linguistics.

The loss of the precious object that is the mother’s body drives desire to

seek its satisfaction in incomplete or partial objects, none of which can ever

fully satisfy the longing bred by the loss of the maternal body. People try

vainly to settle for substitute objects, or what Lacan calls the “object little a.

Lacan’s thinking was heavily influenced by structuralist thinkers such as the

anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss (b. 1908) and linguists Ferdinand de

Saussure (1857-1913) and Roman Jakobson (1896-1982). Lacan’s chief

claim, based upon his readings of Saussure and Jakobson, is that the unconscious

is “structured like a language.” Lacan refashioned Freud’s terminology

of psychic condensation and displacement by translating them into

what Lacan believed to be their equivalent rhetorical terms: metaphor and

metonymy. Metaphor works by condensing two separate images into a single

symbol through substitution, while metonymy operates by association—

using a part to represent the whole (such as “crown” for “king”) or using

contiguous elements (such as “sea” and “boat”).

The presence of the father teaches the child that it must assume a predefined

social and familial role over which it exercises no control—a role

which is defined by the sexual difference between mother and father, the exclusion

of the child from the sexual relationship which exists between the

mother and the father, and the child’s relinquishment of the earlier and intense

bonds which existed between itself and the mother’s body. This situation

of absence, exclusion, and difference is symbolized by the phallus, a

universal signifier or metonymic presence which indicates the fundamental

lack or absence which lies at the heart of being itself—the manque à être, as

Lacan calls it.

anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss (b. 1908) and linguists Ferdinand de

Saussure (1857-1913) and Roman Jakobson (1896-1982). Lacan’s chief

claim, based upon his readings of Saussure and Jakobson, is that the unconscious

is “structured like a language.” Lacan refashioned Freud’s terminology

of psychic condensation and displacement by translating them into

what Lacan believed to be their equivalent rhetorical terms: metaphor and

metonymy. Metaphor works by condensing two separate images into a single

symbol through substitution, while metonymy operates by association—

using a part to represent the whole (such as “crown” for “king”) or using

contiguous elements (such as “sea” and “boat”).

The presence of the father teaches the child that it must assume a predefined

social and familial role over which it exercises no control—a role

which is defined by the sexual difference between mother and father, the exclusion

of the child from the sexual relationship which exists between the

mother and the father, and the child’s relinquishment of the earlier and intense

bonds which existed between itself and the mother’s body. This situation

of absence, exclusion, and difference is symbolized by the phallus, a

universal signifier or metonymic presence which indicates the fundamental

lack or absence which lies at the heart of being itself—the manque à être, as

Lacan calls it.

Lacan calls it.

a.

Lacan’s thinking was heavily influenced by structuralist thinkers such as the

anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss (b. 1908) and linguists Ferdinand de

Saussure (1857-1913) and Roman Jakobson (1896-1982). Lacan’s chief

claim, based upon his readings of Saussure and Jakobson, is that the unconscious

is “structured like a language.” Lacan refashioned Freud’s terminology

of psychic condensation and displacement by translating them into

what Lacan believed to be their equivalent rhetorical terms: metaphor and

metonymy. Metaphor works by condensing two separate images into a single

symbol through substitution, while metonymy operates by association—

using a part to represent the whole (such as “crown” for “king”) or using

contiguous elements (such as “sea” and “boat”).

The presence of the father teaches the child that it must assume a predefined

social and familial role over which it exercises no control—a role

which is defined by the sexual difference between mother and father, the exclusion

of the child from the sexual relationship which exists between the

mother and the father, and the child’s relinquishment of the earlier and intense

bonds which existed between itself and the mother’s body. This situation

of absence, exclusion, and difference is symbolized by the phallus, a

universal signifier or metonymic presence which indicates the fundamental

lack or absence which lies at the heart of being itself—the manque à être, as

Lacan calls it.

anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss (b. 1908) and linguists Ferdinand de

Saussure (1857-1913) and Roman Jakobson (1896-1982). Lacan’s chief

claim, based upon his readings of Saussure and Jakobson, is that the unconscious

is “structured like a language.” Lacan refashioned Freud’s terminology

of psychic condensation and displacement by translating them into

what Lacan believed to be their equivalent rhetorical terms: metaphor and

metonymy. Metaphor works by condensing two separate images into a single

symbol through substitution, while metonymy operates by association—

using a part to represent the whole (such as “crown” for “king”) or using

contiguous elements (such as “sea” and “boat”).

The presence of the father teaches the child that it must assume a predefined

social and familial role over which it exercises no control—a role

which is defined by the sexual difference between mother and father, the exclusion

of the child from the sexual relationship which exists between the

mother and the father, and the child’s relinquishment of the earlier and intense

bonds which existed between itself and the mother’s body. This situation

of absence, exclusion, and difference is symbolized by the phallus, a

universal signifier or metonymic presence which indicates the fundamental

lack or absence which lies at the heart of being itself—the manque à être, as

Lacan calls it.

Lacan calls it.

216 times read

Related news

No matching news for this article
Did you enjoy this article?
Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 11 votes)

comment Comments (0 posted) 

More Top News
Multicultural Psychology
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Author