Header
Home | Set as homepage | Add to favorites
  Search the Site     » Advanced Search
Sections
Syndication
Newsletter



Hemispheric Differences

Sep 14,2010 by xaero

image

The two cerebral hemispheres are connected

by a large band of fibers called the corpus callosum and several small

connections called commissures. In the early 1940’s, American surgeonWilliam

van Wagenen, in order to stop the spread of epileptic seizures from

crossing from one hemisphere to the other, performed the first procedure

of cutting the 200 million fibers of the corpus callosum. The results were

mixed, however, and it was not until the 1960’s that two other American surgeons,

Joe Bogen and P. J. Vogel, decided to try the operation again, this

time also including some cutting of commissure fibers. The results reduced

or stopped the seizures in most patients. However, extensive testing by

American psychobiologist Roger Sperry and his colleagues demonstrated

unique behavioral changes in the patients, called split-brain syndrome. Research

with split-brain syndrome and less invasive imaging techniques of the

brain, such as computed tomography (CT) and positron-emission tomography

(PET) scans, has demonstrated many anatomical and functional differences

between the left and right hemispheres.

The degree of differences between the two cerebral hemispheres varies

greatly, depending on a number of factors. Males develop the greatest

lateralization•differences between the hemispheres•and develop the differences

soonest. Those with a dominant right hand have greater lateralization

than left- or mixed-handers. Therefore, when there is talk of “left

brain versus right brain,” it is important to keep in mind that a greater degree

of difference exists in right-handed males. A minority of people, usu

ally left-handers, show little differences between the left and right hemispheres.

The right hemisphere (RH) tends to be larger and heavier than the left

hemisphere (LH), with the greatest difference in the frontal lobe. Conversely,

several other neurological areas have been found to be larger in the

LH: the occipital lobe, the planum temporale, Wernicke’s area, and the

Sylvian fissure. An interesting gender difference in hemispheric operation

is that the LH amygdala is more active in females, whereas the RH amygdala

is more active in males.

The left-brain/right-brain functional dichotomy has been the subject of

much popular literature. While there are many differences in operation between

the two hemispheres, many of these differences are subtle, and in

many regards both hemispheres are involved in the psychological function

in question, only to different degrees.

The most striking difference between the two hemispheres is that the RH

is responsible for sensory and motor functions of the left side of the body,

and the LH controls those same functions for the body’s right side. This

contralateral control is found, to a lesser degree, for hearing and, due to the

optic chiasm, not at all for vision.

In the domain of sound and communication, the LH plays a greater role

in speech production, language comprehension, phonetic and semantic

analysis, visual word recognition, grammar, verbal learning, lyric recitation,

musical performance, and rhythm keeping. A greater RH contribution is

found in interpreting nonlanguage sounds, reading Braille, using emotional

tone in language, understanding humor and sarcasm, expressing and

interpreting nonverbal communication (facial and bodily expressions), and

perceiving music. Categorical decisions, the understanding of metaphors,

and the figurative aspects of language involve both hemispheres.

Regarding other domains, the RH plays a greater role in mathematical

operations, but the LH is essential for remembering numerical facts and the

reading and writing of numbers. Visually, the RH contributes more to mental

rotation, facial perception, figured/ground distinctions, map reading,

and pattern perception. Detail perception draws more on LH resources.

The RH is linked more with negative emotions such as fear, anger, pain, and

sadness, while positive affect is associated more with the LH. Exceptions are

that schizophrenia, anxiety, and panic attacks have been found to be related

more to increases in LH activity.

ally left-handers, show little differences between the left and right hemispheres.

The right hemisphere (RH) tends to be larger and heavier than the left

hemisphere (LH), with the greatest difference in the frontal lobe. Conversely,

several other neurological areas have been found to be larger in the

LH: the occipital lobe, the planum temporale, Wernicke’s area, and the

Sylvian fissure. An interesting gender difference in hemispheric operation

is that the LH amygdala is more active in females, whereas the RH amygdala

is more active in males.

The left-brain/right-brain functional dichotomy has been the subject of

much popular literature. While there are many differences in operation between

the two hemispheres, many of these differences are subtle, and in

many regards both hemispheres are involved in the psychological function

in question, only to different degrees.

The most striking difference between the two hemispheres is that the RH

is responsible for sensory and motor functions of the left side of the body,

and the LH controls those same functions for the body’s right side. This

contralateral control is found, to a lesser degree, for hearing and, due to the

optic chiasm, not at all for vision.

In the domain of sound and communication, the LH plays a greater role

in speech production, language comprehension, phonetic and semantic

analysis, visual word recognition, grammar, verbal learning, lyric recitation,

musical performance, and rhythm keeping. A greater RH contribution is

found in interpreting nonlanguage sounds, reading Braille, using emotional

tone in language, understanding humor and sarcasm, expressing and

interpreting nonverbal communication (facial and bodily expressions), and

perceiving music. Categorical decisions, the understanding of metaphors,

and the figurative aspects of language involve both hemispheres.

Regarding other domains, the RH plays a greater role in mathematical

operations, but the LH is essential for remembering numerical facts and the

reading and writing of numbers. Visually, the RH contributes more to mental

rotation, facial perception, figured/ground distinctions, map reading,

and pattern perception. Detail perception draws more on LH resources.

The RH is linked more with negative emotions such as fear, anger, pain, and

sadness, while positive affect is associated more with the LH. Exceptions are

that schizophrenia, anxiety, and panic attacks have been found to be related

more to increases in LH activity.

ally left-handers, show little differences between the left and right hemispheres.

The right hemisphere (RH) tends to be larger and heavier than the left

hemisphere (LH), with the greatest difference in the frontal lobe. Conversely,

several other neurological areas have been found to be larger in the

LH: the occipital lobe, the planum temporale, Wernicke’s area, and the

Sylvian fissure. An interesting gender difference in hemispheric operation

is that the LH amygdala is more active in females, whereas the RH amygdala

is more active in males.

The left-brain/right-brain functional dichotomy has been the subject of

much popular literature. While there are many differences in operation between

the two hemispheres, many of these differences are subtle, and in

many regards both hemispheres are involved in the psychological function

in question, only to different degrees.

The most striking difference between the two hemispheres is that the RH

is responsible for sensory and motor functions of the left side of the body,

and the LH controls those same functions for the body’s right side. This

contralateral control is found, to a lesser degree, for hearing and, due to the

optic chiasm, not at all for vision.

In the domain of sound and communication, the LH plays a greater role

in speech production, language comprehension, phonetic and semantic

analysis, visual word recognition, grammar, verbal learning, lyric recitation,

musical performance, and rhythm keeping. A greater RH contribution is

found in interpreting nonlanguage sounds, reading Braille, using emotional

tone in language, understanding humor and sarcasm, expressing and

interpreting nonverbal communication (facial and bodily expressions), and

perceiving music. Categorical decisions, the understanding of metaphors,

and the figurative aspects of language involve both hemispheres.

Regarding other domains, the RH plays a greater role in mathematical

operations, but the LH is essential for remembering numerical facts and the

reading and writing of numbers. Visually, the RH contributes more to mental

rotation, facial perception, figured/ground distinctions, map reading,

and pattern perception. Detail perception draws more on LH resources.

The RH is linked more with negative emotions such as fear, anger, pain, and

sadness, while positive affect is associated more with the LH. Exceptions are

that schizophrenia, anxiety, and panic attacks have been found to be related

more to increases in LH activity.

by a large band of fibers called the corpus callosum and several small

connections called commissures. In the early 1940’s, American surgeonWilliam

van Wagenen, in order to stop the spread of epileptic seizures from

crossing from one hemisphere to the other, performed the first procedure

of cutting the 200 million fibers of the corpus callosum. The results were

mixed, however, and it was not until the 1960’s that two other American surgeons,

Joe Bogen and P. J. Vogel, decided to try the operation again, this

time also including some cutting of commissure fibers. The results reduced

or stopped the seizures in most patients. However, extensive testing by

American psychobiologist Roger Sperry and his colleagues demonstrated

unique behavioral changes in the patients, called split-brain syndrome. Research

with split-brain syndrome and less invasive imaging techniques of the

brain, such as computed tomography (CT) and positron-emission tomography

(PET) scans, has demonstrated many anatomical and functional differences

between the left and right hemispheres.

The degree of differences between the two cerebral hemispheres varies

greatly, depending on a number of factors. Males develop the greatest

lateralization•differences between the hemispheres•and develop the differences

soonest. Those with a dominant right hand have greater lateralization

than left- or mixed-handers. Therefore, when there is talk of “left

brain versus right brain,” it is important to keep in mind that a greater degree

of difference exists in right-handed males. A minority of people, usu

ally left-handers, show little differences between the left and right hemispheres.

The right hemisphere (RH) tends to be larger and heavier than the left

hemisphere (LH), with the greatest difference in the frontal lobe. Conversely,

several other neurological areas have been found to be larger in the

LH: the occipital lobe, the planum temporale, Wernicke’s area, and the

Sylvian fissure. An interesting gender difference in hemispheric operation

is that the LH amygdala is more active in females, whereas the RH amygdala

is more active in males.

The left-brain/right-brain functional dichotomy has been the subject of

much popular literature. While there are many differences in operation between

the two hemispheres, many of these differences are subtle, and in

many regards both hemispheres are involved in the psychological function

in question, only to different degrees.

The most striking difference between the two hemispheres is that the RH

is responsible for sensory and motor functions of the left side of the body,

and the LH controls those same functions for the body’s right side. This

contralateral control is found, to a lesser degree, for hearing and, due to the

optic chiasm, not at all for vision.

In the domain of sound and communication, the LH plays a greater role

in speech production, language comprehension, phonetic and semantic

analysis, visual word recognition, grammar, verbal learning, lyric recitation,

musical performance, and rhythm keeping. A greater RH contribution is

found in interpreting nonlanguage sounds, reading Braille, using emotional

tone in language, understanding humor and sarcasm, expressing and

interpreting nonverbal communication (facial and bodily expressions), and

perceiving music. Categorical decisions, the understanding of metaphors,

and the figurative aspects of language involve both hemispheres.

Regarding other domains, the RH plays a greater role in mathematical

operations, but the LH is essential for remembering numerical facts and the

reading and writing of numbers. Visually, the RH contributes more to mental

rotation, facial perception, figured/ground distinctions, map reading,

and pattern perception. Detail perception draws more on LH resources.

The RH is linked more with negative emotions such as fear, anger, pain, and

sadness, while positive affect is associated more with the LH. Exceptions are

that schizophrenia, anxiety, and panic attacks have been found to be related

more to increases in LH activity.

ally left-handers, show little differences between the left and right hemispheres.

The right hemisphere (RH) tends to be larger and heavier than the left

hemisphere (LH), with the greatest difference in the frontal lobe. Conversely,

several other neurological areas have been found to be larger in the

LH: the occipital lobe, the planum temporale, Wernicke’s area, and the

Sylvian fissure. An interesting gender difference in hemispheric operation

is that the LH amygdala is more active in females, whereas the RH amygdala

is more active in males.

The left-brain/right-brain functional dichotomy has been the subject of

much popular literature. While there are many differences in operation between

the two hemispheres, many of these differences are subtle, and in

many regards both hemispheres are involved in the psychological function

in question, only to different degrees.

The most striking difference between the two hemispheres is that the RH

is responsible for sensory and motor functions of the left side of the body,

and the LH controls those same functions for the body’s right side. This

contralateral control is found, to a lesser degree, for hearing and, due to the

optic chiasm, not at all for vision.

In the domain of sound and communication, the LH plays a greater role

in speech production, language comprehension, phonetic and semantic

analysis, visual word recognition, grammar, verbal learning, lyric recitation,

musical performance, and rhythm keeping. A greater RH contribution is

found in interpreting nonlanguage sounds, reading Braille, using emotional

tone in language, understanding humor and sarcasm, expressing and

interpreting nonverbal communication (facial and bodily expressions), and

perceiving music. Categorical decisions, the understanding of metaphors,

and the figurative aspects of language involve both hemispheres.

Regarding other domains, the RH plays a greater role in mathematical

operations, but the LH is essential for remembering numerical facts and the

reading and writing of numbers. Visually, the RH contributes more to mental

rotation, facial perception, figured/ground distinctions, map reading,

and pattern perception. Detail perception draws more on LH resources.

The RH is linked more with negative emotions such as fear, anger, pain, and

sadness, while positive affect is associated more with the LH. Exceptions are

that schizophrenia, anxiety, and panic attacks have been found to be related

more to increases in LH activity.

ally left-handers, show little differences between the left and right hemispheres.

The right hemisphere (RH) tends to be larger and heavier than the left

hemisphere (LH), with the greatest difference in the frontal lobe. Conversely,

several other neurological areas have been found to be larger in the

LH: the occipital lobe, the planum temporale, Wernicke’s area, and the

Sylvian fissure. An interesting gender difference in hemispheric operation

is that the LH amygdala is more active in females, whereas the RH amygdala

is more active in males.

The left-brain/right-brain functional dichotomy has been the subject of

much popular literature. While there are many differences in operation between

the two hemispheres, many of these differences are subtle, and in

many regards both hemispheres are involved in the psychological function

in question, only to different degrees.

The most striking difference between the two hemispheres is that the RH

is responsible for sensory and motor functions of the left side of the body,

and the LH controls those same functions for the body’s right side. This

contralateral control is found, to a lesser degree, for hearing and, due to the

optic chiasm, not at all for vision.

In the domain of sound and communication, the LH plays a greater role

in speech production, language comprehension, phonetic and semantic

analysis, visual word recognition, grammar, verbal learning, lyric recitation,

musical performance, and rhythm keeping. A greater RH contribution is

found in interpreting nonlanguage sounds, reading Braille, using emotional

tone in language, understanding humor and sarcasm, expressing and

interpreting nonverbal communication (facial and bodily expressions), and

perceiving music. Categorical decisions, the understanding of metaphors,

and the figurative aspects of language involve both hemispheres.

Regarding other domains, the RH plays a greater role in mathematical

operations, but the LH is essential for remembering numerical facts and the

reading and writing of numbers. Visually, the RH contributes more to mental

rotation, facial perception, figured/ground distinctions, map reading,

and pattern perception. Detail perception draws more on LH resources.

The RH is linked more with negative emotions such as fear, anger, pain, and

sadness, while positive affect is associated more with the LH. Exceptions are

that schizophrenia, anxiety, and panic attacks have been found to be related

more to increases in LH activity.

The two cerebral hemispheres are connected

by a large band of fibers called the corpus callosum and several small

connections called commissures. In the early 1940’s, American surgeonWilliam

van Wagenen, in order to stop the spread of epileptic seizures from

crossing from one hemisphere to the other, performed the first procedure

of cutting the 200 million fibers of the corpus callosum. The results were

mixed, however, and it was not until the 1960’s that two other American surgeons,

Joe Bogen and P. J. Vogel, decided to try the operation again, this

time also including some cutting of commissure fibers. The results reduced

or stopped the seizures in most patients. However, extensive testing by

American psychobiologist Roger Sperry and his colleagues demonstrated

unique behavioral changes in the patients, called split-brain syndrome. Research

with split-brain syndrome and less invasive imaging techniques of the

brain, such as computed tomography (CT) and positron-emission tomography

(PET) scans, has demonstrated many anatomical and functional differences

between the left and right hemispheres.

The degree of differences between the two cerebral hemispheres varies

greatly, depending on a number of factors. Males develop the greatest

lateralization•differences between the hemispheres•and develop the differences

soonest. Those with a dominant right hand have greater lateralization

than left- or mixed-handers. Therefore, when there is talk of “left

brain versus right brain,” it is important to keep in mind that a greater degree

of difference exists in right-handed males. A minority of people, usu

ally left-handers, show little differences between the left and right hemispheres.

The right hemisphere (RH) tends to be larger and heavier than the left

hemisphere (LH), with the greatest difference in the frontal lobe. Conversely,

several other neurological areas have been found to be larger in the

LH: the occipital lobe, the planum temporale, Wernicke’s area, and the

Sylvian fissure. An interesting gender difference in hemispheric operation

is that the LH amygdala is more active in females, whereas the RH amygdala

is more active in males.

The left-brain/right-brain functional dichotomy has been the subject of

much popular literature. While there are many differences in operation between

the two hemispheres, many of these differences are subtle, and in

many regards both hemispheres are involved in the psychological function

in question, only to different degrees.

The most striking difference between the two hemispheres is that the RH

is responsible for sensory and motor functions of the left side of the body,

and the LH controls those same functions for the body’s right side. This

contralateral control is found, to a lesser degree, for hearing and, due to the

optic chiasm, not at all for vision.

In the domain of sound and communication, the LH plays a greater role

in speech production, language comprehension, phonetic and semantic

analysis, visual word recognition, grammar, verbal learning, lyric recitation,

musical performance, and rhythm keeping. A greater RH contribution is

found in interpreting nonlanguage sounds, reading Braille, using emotional

tone in language, understanding humor and sarcasm, expressing and

interpreting nonverbal communication (facial and bodily expressions), and

perceiving music. Categorical decisions, the understanding of metaphors,

and the figurative aspects of language involve both hemispheres.

Regarding other domains, the RH plays a greater role in mathematical

operations, but the LH is essential for remembering numerical facts and the

reading and writing of numbers. Visually, the RH contributes more to mental

rotation, facial perception, figured/ground distinctions, map reading,

and pattern perception. Detail perception draws more on LH resources.

The RH is linked more with negative emotions such as fear, anger, pain, and

sadness, while positive affect is associated more with the LH. Exceptions are

that schizophrenia, anxiety, and panic attacks have been found to be related

more to increases in LH activity.

ally left-handers, show little differences between the left and right hemispheres.

The right hemisphere (RH) tends to be larger and heavier than the left

hemisphere (LH), with the greatest difference in the frontal lobe. Conversely,

several other neurological areas have been found to be larger in the

LH: the occipital lobe, the planum temporale, Wernicke’s area, and the

Sylvian fissure. An interesting gender difference in hemispheric operation

is that the LH amygdala is more active in females, whereas the RH amygdala

is more active in males.

The left-brain/right-brain functional dichotomy has been the subject of

much popular literature. While there are many differences in operation between

the two hemispheres, many of these differences are subtle, and in

many regards both hemispheres are involved in the psychological function

in question, only to different degrees.

The most striking difference between the two hemispheres is that the RH

is responsible for sensory and motor functions of the left side of the body,

and the LH controls those same functions for the body’s right side. This

contralateral control is found, to a lesser degree, for hearing and, due to the

optic chiasm, not at all for vision.

In the domain of sound and communication, the LH plays a greater role

in speech production, language comprehension, phonetic and semantic

analysis, visual word recognition, grammar, verbal learning, lyric recitation,

musical performance, and rhythm keeping. A greater RH contribution is

found in interpreting nonlanguage sounds, reading Braille, using emotional

tone in language, understanding humor and sarcasm, expressing and

interpreting nonverbal communication (facial and bodily expressions), and

perceiving music. Categorical decisions, the understanding of metaphors,

and the figurative aspects of language involve both hemispheres.

Regarding other domains, the RH plays a greater role in mathematical

operations, but the LH is essential for remembering numerical facts and the

reading and writing of numbers. Visually, the RH contributes more to mental

rotation, facial perception, figured/ground distinctions, map reading,

and pattern perception. Detail perception draws more on LH resources.

The RH is linked more with negative emotions such as fear, anger, pain, and

sadness, while positive affect is associated more with the LH. Exceptions are

that schizophrenia, anxiety, and panic attacks have been found to be related

more to increases in LH activity.

ally left-handers, show little differences between the left and right hemispheres.

The right hemisphere (RH) tends to be larger and heavier than the left

hemisphere (LH), with the greatest difference in the frontal lobe. Conversely,

several other neurological areas have been found to be larger in the

LH: the occipital lobe, the planum temporale, Wernicke’s area, and the

Sylvian fissure. An interesting gender difference in hemispheric operation

is that the LH amygdala is more active in females, whereas the RH amygdala

is more active in males.

The left-brain/right-brain functional dichotomy has been the subject of

much popular literature. While there are many differences in operation between

the two hemispheres, many of these differences are subtle, and in

many regards both hemispheres are involved in the psychological function

in question, only to different degrees.

The most striking difference between the two hemispheres is that the RH

is responsible for sensory and motor functions of the left side of the body,

and the LH controls those same functions for the body’s right side. This

contralateral control is found, to a lesser degree, for hearing and, due to the

optic chiasm, not at all for vision.

In the domain of sound and communication, the LH plays a greater role

in speech production, language comprehension, phonetic and semantic

analysis, visual word recognition, grammar, verbal learning, lyric recitation,

musical performance, and rhythm keeping. A greater RH contribution is

found in interpreting nonlanguage sounds, reading Braille, using emotional

tone in language, understanding humor and sarcasm, expressing and

interpreting nonverbal communication (facial and bodily expressions), and

perceiving music. Categorical decisions, the understanding of metaphors,

and the figurative aspects of language involve both hemispheres.

Regarding other domains, the RH plays a greater role in mathematical

operations, but the LH is essential for remembering numerical facts and the

reading and writing of numbers. Visually, the RH contributes more to mental

rotation, facial perception, figured/ground distinctions, map reading,

and pattern perception. Detail perception draws more on LH resources.

The RH is linked more with negative emotions such as fear, anger, pain, and

sadness, while positive affect is associated more with the LH. Exceptions are

that schizophrenia, anxiety, and panic attacks have been found to be related

more to increases in LH activity.

Summary

It has been estimated that the adult human brain contains 100 billion neurons,

forming more than 13 trillion connections with one another. These

connections are constantly changing, depending on how much learning is

occurring and on the health of the brain. In this dynamic system of different

neurological areas concerned with diverse functions, the question arises of

how a sense of wholeness and stability emerges. In other words, where is the

“me” in the mind? While some areas of the brain, such as the frontal lobe,

appear more closely linked with such intimate aspects of identity as planning

and making choices, it is likely that no single structure or particular

function can be equated with the self. It may take the activity of the whole

brain to give a sense of wholeness to life. Moreover, the self is not to be

found anyplace in the brain itself. Instead, it is what the brain does—its patterns

of activity—that defines the self.

“me” in the mind? While some areas of the brain, such as the frontal lobe,

appear more closely linked with such intimate aspects of identity as planning

and making choices, it is likely that no single structure or particular

function can be equated with the self. It may take the activity of the whole

brain to give a sense of wholeness to life. Moreover, the self is not to be

found anyplace in the brain itself. Instead, it is what the brain does—its patterns

of activity—that defines the self.

Sources for Further Study

Goldberg, Stephen. Clinical Neuroanatomy Made Ridiculously Simple. Miami:

MedMaster, 2000. One of a series of books intended to help students in

the medical professions by presenting an abbreviated version of various

medical subjects. The use of mnemonic devices, humor, and case studies

makes the book accessible to a college-educated audience.

Hendleman, Walter J. Atlas of Functional Neuroanatomy. Boca Raton, Fla.:

CRC Press, 2000. Presents a visual tour of the brain through drawings,

photographs, and computer-generated illustrations. Three-dimensional

images of the brain can be observed by using the accompanying CDROM.

Kalat, James W. Biological Psychology. 8th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Thomson

Wadsworth, 2004. A top-selling book in the area of physiological psychology.

While intended for college students, this engaging, easy-to-read text

is accessible to general audiences. Two chapters contain excellent overviews

of brain anatomy and functioning.

Ornstein, Robert. The Right Mind: Making Sense of the Hemispheres. New York:

Harcourt Brace, 1997. The author who helped popularize the left-brain/

right-brain dichotomy in The Psychology of Consciousness (1972) reexamines

the functioning of the two hemispheres in this book. The result is an

easy-to-read, entertaining view of hemispheric lateralization that dispels

many myths about differences in hemispheric functioning.

Ornstein, Robert, and Richard F. Thompson. The Amazing Brain. Boston:

Houghton Mifflin, 1991. One of the best introductory books about the

brain, written with a light and humorous touch. The lay reader will enjoy

the accessibility of the text, the excellent (and unique) sketches, and the

fanciful flare the authors use in examining a complicated subject.

Clinical Neuroanatomy Made Ridiculously Simple. Miami:

MedMaster, 2000. One of a series of books intended to help students in

the medical professions by presenting an abbreviated version of various

medical subjects. The use of mnemonic devices, humor, and case studies

makes the book accessible to a college-educated audience.

Hendleman, Walter J. Atlas of Functional Neuroanatomy. Boca Raton, Fla.:

CRC Press, 2000. Presents a visual tour of the brain through drawings,

photographs, and computer-generated illustrations. Three-dimensional

images of the brain can be observed by using the accompanying CDROM.

Kalat, James W. Biological Psychology. 8th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Thomson

Wadsworth, 2004. A top-selling book in the area of physiological psychology.

While intended for college students, this engaging, easy-to-read text

is accessible to general audiences. Two chapters contain excellent overviews

of brain anatomy and functioning.

Ornstein, Robert. The Right Mind: Making Sense of the Hemispheres. New York:

Harcourt Brace, 1997. The author who helped popularize the left-brain/

right-brain dichotomy in The Psychology of Consciousness (1972) reexamines

the functioning of the two hemispheres in this book. The result is an

easy-to-read, entertaining view of hemispheric lateralization that dispels

many myths about differences in hemispheric functioning.

Ornstein, Robert, and Richard F. Thompson. The Amazing Brain. Boston:

Houghton Mifflin, 1991. One of the best introductory books about the

brain, written with a light and humorous touch. The lay reader will enjoy

the accessibility of the text, the excellent (and unique) sketches, and the

fanciful flare the authors use in examining a complicated subject.

Atlas of Functional Neuroanatomy. Boca Raton, Fla.:

CRC Press, 2000. Presents a visual tour of the brain through drawings,

photographs, and computer-generated illustrations. Three-dimensional

images of the brain can be observed by using the accompanying CDROM.

Kalat, James W. Biological Psychology. 8th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Thomson

Wadsworth, 2004. A top-selling book in the area of physiological psychology.

While intended for college students, this engaging, easy-to-read text

is accessible to general audiences. Two chapters contain excellent overviews

of brain anatomy and functioning.

Ornstein, Robert. The Right Mind: Making Sense of the Hemispheres. New York:

Harcourt Brace, 1997. The author who helped popularize the left-brain/

right-brain dichotomy in The Psychology of Consciousness (1972) reexamines

the functioning of the two hemispheres in this book. The result is an

easy-to-read, entertaining view of hemispheric lateralization that dispels

many myths about differences in hemispheric functioning.

Ornstein, Robert, and Richard F. Thompson. The Amazing Brain. Boston:

Houghton Mifflin, 1991. One of the best introductory books about the

brain, written with a light and humorous touch. The lay reader will enjoy

the accessibility of the text, the excellent (and unique) sketches, and the

fanciful flare the authors use in examining a complicated subject.

Biological Psychology. 8th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Thomson

Wadsworth, 2004. A top-selling book in the area of physiological psychology.

While intended for college students, this engaging, easy-to-read text

is accessible to general audiences. Two chapters contain excellent overviews

of brain anatomy and functioning.

Ornstein, Robert. The Right Mind: Making Sense of the Hemispheres. New York:

Harcourt Brace, 1997. The author who helped popularize the left-brain/

right-brain dichotomy in The Psychology of Consciousness (1972) reexamines

the functioning of the two hemispheres in this book. The result is an

easy-to-read, entertaining view of hemispheric lateralization that dispels

many myths about differences in hemispheric functioning.

Ornstein, Robert, and Richard F. Thompson. The Amazing Brain. Boston:

Houghton Mifflin, 1991. One of the best introductory books about the

brain, written with a light and humorous touch. The lay reader will enjoy

the accessibility of the text, the excellent (and unique) sketches, and the

fanciful flare the authors use in examining a complicated subject.

The Right Mind: Making Sense of the Hemispheres. New York:

Harcourt Brace, 1997. The author who helped popularize the left-brain/

right-brain dichotomy in The Psychology of Consciousness (1972) reexamines

the functioning of the two hemispheres in this book. The result is an

easy-to-read, entertaining view of hemispheric lateralization that dispels

many myths about differences in hemispheric functioning.

Ornstein, Robert, and Richard F. Thompson. The Amazing Brain. Boston:

Houghton Mifflin, 1991. One of the best introductory books about the

brain, written with a light and humorous touch. The lay reader will enjoy

the accessibility of the text, the excellent (and unique) sketches, and the

fanciful flare the authors use in examining a complicated subject.

The Psychology of Consciousness (1972) reexamines

the functioning of the two hemispheres in this book. The result is an

easy-to-read, entertaining view of hemispheric lateralization that dispels

many myths about differences in hemispheric functioning.

Ornstein, Robert, and Richard F. Thompson. The Amazing Brain. Boston:

Houghton Mifflin, 1991. One of the best introductory books about the

brain, written with a light and humorous touch. The lay reader will enjoy

the accessibility of the text, the excellent (and unique) sketches, and the

fanciful flare the authors use in examining a complicated subject.

The Amazing Brain. Boston:

Houghton Mifflin, 1991. One of the best introductory books about the

brain, written with a light and humorous touch. The lay reader will enjoy

the accessibility of the text, the excellent (and unique) sketches, and the

fanciful flare the authors use in examining a complicated subject.

Paul J. Chara, Jr.

See also: Animal Experimentation; Consciousness; Consciousness: Altered

States; Endocrine System; Hormones and Behavior; Memory; Memory: Animal

Research; Nervous System; Neuropsychology. 151

Animal Experimentation; Consciousness; Consciousness: Altered

States; Endocrine System; Hormones and Behavior; Memory; Memory: Animal

Research; Nervous System; Neuropsychology. 151

75 times read

Related news

No matching news for this article
Did you enjoy this article?
Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 4 votes)

comment Comments (0 posted) 

More Top News
Multicultural Psychology
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Author