Evolutionary psychologists have provided an important new way to look at
why individuals are attracted to others. Borrowing from the basic theorizing
of the English biologist Charles Darwin, psychologists are paying increasing
attention to the information provided by both physical and social features of
living creatures. Everyone is influenced by what people look like; they form
impressions of others before they even hear them speak. People often use
the appearance and behavior of others to make a variety of judgments about
them. These judgments are made quickly and unconsciously and are fairly
resistant to change. What sort of impressions are formed? What aspects of a
person are focused upon? Evolutionary psychology has some answers to
these questions.
Specifically, evolutionary psychologists suggest that the attractiveness of a
person’s body serves as a valuable and subtle indicator of social behavior, social
relationship potential, fitness, reproductive value, and health. Evolutionary
psychologists place heavy emphasis on clearly observable features of
human bodies and do not focus as much on internal, unobservable aspects
of personality such as kindness or trustworthiness. There is a growing body
of research that supports these ideas. For example, significant relationships
were found between attractiveness and measures of mental health, social
anxiety, and popularity, so the idea behind evolutionary theory does seem to
be relevant.
Most work studying how body characteristics relate to attractiveness has
focused on a single factor, such as the face, although many features of the
body can influence attractiveness. Faces are often the first part of a person
that is looked at. Furthermore, the face is almost always clearly visible (except
for those of women in cultures that forbid it). Social psychologists
have shown that people often make quick judgments about others based on
their faces, and more than 80 percent of studies on judging attractiveness
have focused on the face alone. The sex, age, and past experiences of the
perceiver, specific facial features such as large lips for women and strong
jaws for men, body and facial symmetry, and specific body ratios such as the
waist-to-hip ratio (WHR, the number attained by dividing the waist measurement
by the circumference of the hips) all influence judgments of attractiveness.
Consistent with this idea are findings that some standards of attractiveness
are consistent across time and cultures. For example, people with
symmetrical faces—those whose eyes and ears appear to be of equal size and
equal distances apart—are preferred over people who do not have symmetrical
faces. 118
equal distances apart—are preferred over people who do not have symmetrical
faces. 118