Yin suggests that case-study designs vary according to two distinct dimensions.
One dimension accounts for the number of “cases” being studied: the
presence of either single- or multiple-case designs. A second dimension allows
for case studies to be either “holistic” (studying the entire unit of analysis
as a single global entity) or “embedded” (allowing multiple units of analysis
to be studied for the purpose of understanding their interworkings).
According to Yin, this classification system leaves the researcher with a
choice among four different design types: single-case (holistic) design, single-
case (embedded) design, multiple-case (holistic) design, and multiplecase
(embedded) design. Choosing among these designs involves the kinds
of research questions that the researcher is attempting to answer.
Case-study methods are initiated for a variety of reasons, one of which is
to serve as a vehicle for exploratory research. As a new research area begins
to develop, the initial uncharted territory is sometimes best studied (particularly
when the research questions are ill-defined) using a case-study method
to determine which direction should be pursued first. This method has therefore
been commonly misperceived as being able to contribute only in a limited
exploratory capacity; however, the case study can, and should, be used
not only to help focus initial research questions but also to describe and explain
behaviors. As Yin makes clear, both “how” questions and “why” questions
can be answered by this approach.