The Size of Random Variations to a Natural Information Store
The Size of Random Variations to a Natural Information Store Natural information stores have mechanisms to ensure that variations to the store are small. If, in order to deal with a very complex, variable environment, a store is very large, then relative to its size, any usable alterations will constitute a minute proportion of the total store. A large variation in the store will almost certainly disrupt essential functions and so is incompatible with the continuation of a natural store in a natural environment. Individual mutations and genetic recombination that permit continuation of a species constitute a very small proportion of a genetic code. A substantial genetic shift will take many thousands or even millions of years. The huge overlap in the genetic code of species that separated millions of years ago is a testament to the stability of genetic codes. Changes over short periods are minute. Only such small variations are viable. Large variations do not survive. Similarly, as indicated by the working memory limitations Evolution of human cognitive architecture 239continuum, human working memory ensures that alterations to the long- term memory store are relatively slow and small. In summary, mutation and sexual recombination result in quite random variations analogous to the random choice of moves faced by a person solving a problem for which schema-based solutions are not available. The usefulness or otherwise of a genetic variation can only be assessed after it has occurred. If it is successful, information in the genetic code will be passed on to subsequent generations, whereas a failure will result in a genetic dead end with the information not passed to subsequent generations. Similarly, when limited or no knowledge is available to a problem solver, moves must be chosen randomly. Successful moves may be incorporated in schemas that then can be used indefinitely when faced with similar circumstances. Unsuccessful moves result in dead ends with information not incorporated in schemas and not used subsequently. Under this formula, a schema encapsulates psychological information in the same way that a gene encapsulates genetic information. Both can be reproduced indefinitely, providing the environment supports the use of that information. Nevertheless, alternative schemas/genes may be more appro- priate for environmental conditions. If inappropriate, the structure of the information encapsulated in schemas or genes must change. Changes or variations are generated randomly and tested against the environment. If successful, a new schema or gene will be constructed and used in future. Thus, natural selection and the processing of information by human cognitive architecture can be characterized as identical ways of handling very complex information.
150 times read
|
Related news
|
| No matching news for this article |
|
Did you enjoy this article?
    (total 26 votes)
|