Home : Child Psychology : Social Changes Associated with Adolescence in Western Industrialized Countries
Social Changes Associated with Adolescence in Western Industrialized Countries
Social Changes Associated with
Adolescence in Western Industrialized
Countries
There are also major social changes associated
with adolescence. Since these vary more across cul-
tures than the biological and cognitive changes just
discussed, the following social changes are common
in Western industrialized countries.
Friendships and Peer Groups
Probably the most controversial changes during
adolescence are those linked to peer relationships.
One major change in this arena is the general in-
crease in peer focus and involvement in peer-related
social sports, and other extracurricular activities.
Many adolescents attach great importance to the ac-
tivities they do with their peers—substantially more
importance than they attach to academic activities
and to activities with family members. Further, early
adolescents’ confidence in their physical appearance
and social acceptance is a more important predictor
of self-esteem than confidence in their cognitive/
academic competence.
In part because of the importance of social accep-
tance during adolescence, friendship networks dur-
ing this period often are organized into relatively
rigid cliques that differ in social status within school
and community settings. The existence of these
cliques reflects adolescents’ need to establish a sense
ADOLESCENCE 9During adolescence, many young people attach greater importance
to the activities and opinions of their peers than those of family
members. (Robert J. Huffman/Field Mark Publications)
of identity; belonging to a group is one way to solve
the problem of ‘‘who I am.’’ Also, in part because of
the importance of social acceptance, children’s con-
formity to their peers peaks during early adolescence.
Much has been written about how this peer conformi-
ty creates problems for adolescents, and about how
‘‘good’’ children are often corrupted by the negative
influences of peers, particularly by adolescent gangs.
More often than not, however, adolescents agree
more with their parents’ views on ‘‘major’’ issues such
as morality, politics, religion, and the importance of
education. Peers have more influence on such things
as dress and clothing styles, music, and activity choice.
In addition, adolescents tend to socialize with peers
who hold similar views as their parents on the major
issues listed above.
Changes in Family Relations
Although the extent of actual disruption in par-
ent-adolescent relations is not as great as one might
expect given stereotypes about this period of life.
There is little question that parent-child relations do
change during adolescence. As adolescents become
physically mature they often seek more independence
and autonomy and may begin to question family rules
and roles, leading to conflicts particularly around
such issues as dress and appearance, chores, and dat-
ing. Despite these conflicts over day-to-day issues,
parents and adolescents agree more than they dis-
agree regarding core values linked to education, poli-
tics, and spirituality. Nonetheless, parents and
adolescents do interact with each other less frequently
than they did in middle childhood. Some researchers
have argued that this distancing in parent-adolescent
relations has great functional value for adolescents, in
that it fosters their individuation from their parents,
allows them to try more things on their own, and de-
velops their own competencies and confidence in
their abilities. But it is important to bear in mind that,
in most families, this distancing takes place in the
context of continuing close emotional relationships.
And in many cultural groups, adolescents play an in-
creasingly central role in family life and family main-
tenance.
School Transitions
In most Western countries, adolescents experi-
ence at least one major school transition (e.g., the
transition into high school) and often two major
school transitions (e.g., an additional transition into
either middle or junior high school). Several scholars
and policymakers have argued that these school tran-
sitions are linked to negative changes in the function-
ing of many adolescents, particularly in the realm of
academic achievement. For example, a number of re-
searchers have concluded that the junior high school
transition contributes to declines in interest in school,
intrinsic motivation, self-concepts/self-perceptions,
and confidence in one’s intellectual abilities. Drawing
upon person-environment fit theory, Jacquelynne Ec-
cles and her colleagues proposed that the negative
motivational and behavioral changes associated with
these school transitions stem from many junior and
senior high schools not providing appropriate educa-
tional environments for youth in early and middle ad-
olescence. According to person-environment theory,
individuals’ behavior, motivation, and mental health
are influenced by the fit between the characteristics
individuals bring to their social environments and the
characteristics of these social environments. Individu-
als are not likely to do very well, or be very motivated,
10 ADOLESCENCEif they are in social environments that do not fit their
psychological needs. If the social environments in the
typical junior and senior high schools do not fit very
well with the psychological needs of adolescents, then
person-environment fit theory predicts a decline in
the motivation, interest, performance, and behavior
of adolescents as they move into this environment.
Evidence from a variety of sources supports this
hypothesis. Both of these school transitions usually
involve the following types of contextual changes: (1)
a shift from a smaller school to a larger school; (2) a
shift to a more bureaucratic social system; (3) a shift
to a more controlling social system; (4) a shift to a
more heterogeneous social system; (5) a shift to a so-
cial context with less personal contact with adults and
less opportunity to be engaged in school activities and
responsible school roles; (6) a shift to a more rigid, so-
cially comparative grading system; and (7) a shift to
a more lock-step curriculum tracking system. Along
with these changes, evidence from more micro-
classroom-based studies suggests that the teachers in
junior and senior high school feel less able to teach
all of their students the more challenging academic
material and are more likely to use exclusionary and
harsh discipline strategies that can effectively drive
low achieving and problematic students away from
school. Work in a variety of areas has documented the
impact on motivation of such changes in classroom
and school environments.
See also: DEVELOPMENTAL NORMS; MILESTONES OF
DEVELOPMENT
Bibliography
Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne, and Edward Reiter. ‘‘The Role of Pubertal
Processes.’’ In Shirley Feldman and Glen Elliott eds., At the
Threshold: The Developing Adolescent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 1990.
Brown, Brad. ‘‘Peer Groups and Peer Cultures.’’ In Shirley Feld-
man and Glen Elliott eds., At the Threshold: The Developing Ado-
lescent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
Buchanan, Christy, Jacquelynne Eccles, and Jill Becker. ‘‘Are Ado-
lescents the Victims of Raging Hormones? Evidence for Ac-
tivational Effects of Hormones on Moods and Behaviors at
Adolescence.’’ Psychological Bulletin 111 (1992):62–107.
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. Turning Points: Pre-
paring American Youth for the Twenty-First Century. New York:
Carnegie Corporation, 1989.
Collins, W. Andrew. ‘‘Parent-Child Relationships in the Transition
to Adolescence: Continuity and Change in Interaction, Affect,
and Cognition.’’ In Raymond Montemayor, Gerald Adams,
and Thomas Gullotta eds., From Childhood to Adolescence: A
Transitional Period? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1990.
Eccles, Jacquelynne, Carol Midgley, Christy Buchanan, Allen Wig-
field, David Reuman, and Douglas Mac Iver. ‘‘Developmental
during Adolescence: The Impact of Stage/Environment Fit.’’
American Psychologist 48 (1993):90–101.
Eccles, Jacquelynne, Sarah Lord, Robert Roeser, Bonnie Barber,
and Deborah Jozefowicz. ‘‘The Association of School Transi-
tions in Early Adolescence with Developmental Trajectories
through High School.’’ In John Schulenberg, Jennifer Maggs,
and Klaus Hurrelmann eds., Health Risks and Developmental
Transitions during Adolescence. New York: Cambridge Universi-
ty Press, 1996.
Erikson, Erik. Childhood and Society. New York: Norton, 1963.
Harter, Susan. ‘‘Causes, Correlates, and the Functional Role of
Self-Worth: A Life-Span Perspective.’’ In Robert Sternberg
and John Kolligian eds., Competence Considered. New Haven,
CT: Yale University Press, 1990.
Keating, Daniel. ‘‘Adolescent Thinking.’’ In Shirley Feldman and
Glen Elliott eds., At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
Olweus, Daniel, A. Mattssoon, Daisy Schalling, and Hans Loew.
‘‘Circulating Testosterone Levels and Aggression in Adoles-
cent Males: A Causal Analysis.’’ Psychosomatic Medicine 50
(1988):261–272.
Piaget, Jean, and Bärbel Inhelder. Memory and Intelligence. London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973.
Selman, Robert. The Growth of Interpersonal Understanding. New
York: Academic Press, 1980.
Siegler, Robert. Children’s Thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice
Hall, 1986.
Simmons, Roberta, and Dale Blyth. Moving into Adolescence: The Im-
pact of Pubertal Change and School Context. Hawthorn, NY: Al-
dine de Gruyler, 1987.
Stattin, Håkan, and David Magnusson. Pubertal Maturation in Fe-
male Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990.
Steinberg, Lawrence. ‘‘Autonomy, Conflict, and Harmony in the
Family Relationship.’’ In Shirley Feldman and Glen Elliott
eds., At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
Sullivan, Harry. The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. New York:
Norton, 1953.
Susman, Elizabeth, Gale Inoff-Germain, Edith Nottelmann, D.
Lynn Loriaux, C. B. Cutler, and George Chrousos. ‘‘Hor-
mones, Emotional Dispositions, and Aggressive Attributes in
Young Adolescents.’’ Child Development 58 (1987):1114–1134.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and
Improvement. Youth Indicators, 1988. Washington, DC: U.S.
Government Printing Office, 1988.
Wigfield, Allan, Jacquelynne Eccles, and Paul Pintrich. ‘‘Develop-
ment between the Ages of Eleven and Twenty-Five.’’ In David
Berliner and Robert Calfee eds., The Handbook of Educational
Psychology. New York: Macmillan, 1996.
Jacquelynne S. Eccle
116 times read
|